Final answer:
The split labor market and reserve labor force concepts align with the conflict perspective, focusing on societal inequalities and power struggles, not with the symbolic interactionist perspective that studies meanings and interpersonal interactions.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement that the split labor market and reserve labor force are most aligned with the symbolic interactionist perspective is false. These concepts are actually more closely related to the conflict perspective, which focuses on the struggles between different groups within society, especially in terms of social inequalities, power, and the allocation of resources. The symbolic interactionist perspective, on the other hand, examines society and social relations through the study of symbols, meanings, and interactions at a more micro-level. For example, in question 15, the answer that best represents stratification from the perspective of symbolic interactionism is (b) After work, Pat, a janitor, feels more comfortable eating in a truck stop than a French restaurant, demonstrating how individual interactions and meanings can reinforce social hierarchies. Moreover, the concept that gender inequality comes from the division of labor is aligned with the functionalist perspective (b), which views divisions of labor as necessary for the functioning of society but also recognizes that these divisions can contribute to different roles and inequality.