Final answer:
The statement that all planned programs must be completely supported by an association's dues is False as organizations can have various revenue streams. In historical contexts, American colonists objected to the application of taxes (True), mother country didn't agree to most demands of American colonists (False), necessary and proper clause expanded government power (False), US voting rates are lower than some democracies (False), and Benjamin Franklin established an abolitionist society (True).
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement 'Ultimately, any planned program must be completely supported by the association's dues' can be False. Not all organizations rely solely on dues from members for their operations and programs. For example, some organizations, like Planned Parenthood, depend on voluntary members and may also rely on donations, government grants, and other sources of revenue. Labor unions often have a 'union shop' arrangement where union membership and dues are a condition of employment. The ability to finance programs exclusively through dues depends on the organization's structure and additional revenue streams.
Looking at historical contexts, such as the American colonists' attitude towards taxation, it indicates that it wasn't the concept of taxation itself that was objected to, but rather how the tax money was applied, which is suggested to be True. Additionally, in the Conciliatory Proposition, it is believed that the mother country did not give in to most of the demands of the American colonists, which could be considered False.
The necessary and proper clause, rather than limiting, has often been interpreted to expand the power of the national government (False). When it comes to voting rates, the United States does not have higher rates compared to many democratic industrialized countries (False). Lastly, Benjamin Franklin was indeed a founder of the first abolitionist society in America, making that statement True.