Final Answer:
The statement is False (b). The low cost of phones compared to computers is a more accurate reflection of the global distribution of these devices.
Step-by-step explanation:
Contrary to the statement, the global trend highlights the increasing affordability and accessibility of smartphones compared to traditional computers. Over the years, advancements in technology and economies of scale have significantly lowered the production cost of smartphones, making them more accessible to a larger population worldwide.
Smartphones are often more cost-effective due to their compact design, integrated components, and mass production, allowing manufacturers to offer them at lower price points.
This has led to a higher penetration rate of smartphones in developing regions and among demographics with limited resources. In contrast, traditional computers, including desktops and laptops, tend to have higher production costs, making them less accessible to a significant portion of the global population.
The implications of this trend are profound, as smartphones provide a gateway to essential services, information, and communication tools for individuals who may not have access to traditional computers.
As a result, the widespread adoption of smartphones has played a pivotal role in bridging the digital divide and empowering people around the world with connectivity and information at their fingertips.
In summary, the statement is false, as the low cost of smartphones compared to computers has contributed to a more widespread adoption of mobile devices globally. This accessibility is a driving force behind increased connectivity and digital inclusion.