92.7k views
1 vote
What was the most likely reason there is so little archaeological evidence from neolithic and Paleolithic hunter gatherers?

User Enpith
by
9.0k points

1 Answer

3 votes

Final answer:

The scarcity of archaeological evidence from Neolithic and Paleolithic hunter-gatherers can be attributed to their nomadic lifestyle, lack of permanent settlements, and the use of organic and perishable materials for tools and materials.

Step-by-step explanation:

The most likely reason there is so little archaeological evidence from Neolithic and Paleolithic hunter-gatherers is due to several factors.

1. Nomadic lifestyle: Hunter-gatherer societies were nomadic, moving from one place to another in search of food and resources. This constant movement made it difficult for artifacts to be preserved over time, as they would have been left behind or deteriorated.

2. Lack of permanent settlements: Unlike agricultural societies that built permanent settlements, hunter-gatherers relied on temporary shelters such as caves or simple huts. These structures were not as durable as the stone buildings of later civilizations and would not have left as much evidence behind.

3. Organic and perishable materials: Many of the tools and materials used by hunter-gatherers were made from organic and perishable materials such as wood, bone, and hides. These materials decompose over time, leaving little trace in the archaeological record.

These factors contribute to the scarcity of archaeological evidence from Neolithic and Paleolithic hunter-gatherers, making it challenging for researchers to reconstruct their way of life.

User Mihawk
by
8.1k points