Final answer:
Titus Kaphar compares using art to amend history to altering the Constitution, emphasizing how both art and legal frameworks are subject to reinterpretation and evolution in reflecting society's changes.
Step-by-step explanation:
In his presentation, Titus Kaphar compares using art to amend history the way we are able to amend the Constitution. Kaphar creates paintings and sculptures that address historical struggles and contemporary diversity. His method of amending history through art is analogous to how the Constitution can be formally changed or amended. This reflects the flexibility and adaptability in interpreting historical documents, similar to how Kaphar suggests we might reinterpret and confront the narratives within art.
Culture and art are intrinsically linked as art reflects the societal values, struggles, and progress of its time. Kaphar's technique involves physically altering a painting to reveal unspoken truths, much like how constitutional amendments refine and improve upon the framework of laws. These connections illustrate how both art and legal frameworks evolve.