Final answer:
The LBC Truck Co. used arbitration with the trucker's union to have an arbitrator resolve their dispute, which often involves negotiation over employment conditions and can lead to a compromise that addresses both technology implementation and workers' benefits.
Step-by-step explanation:
When the LBC Truck Co. resorted to arbitration with the trucker's union, it means that they engaged in a process to resolve a dispute outside of court where an impartial third party, called an arbitrator, makes a decision after hearing both sides' arguments. This is a common method to settle disagreements between employers and unions regarding work conditions, pay, and other employment-related matters. For example, previous labor disputes have involved opposition to the use of labor-saving technology that could reduce the number of union jobs, as seen in the 2015 incident where the use of handheld scanners and computer-operated cabs were key issues. In such cases, federal mediators might intervene, and laws like the Labor Management Relations Act of 1947, also known as the Taft-Hartley Act, can facilitate negotiations by imposing a "cooling-off period" to avoid work stoppages. The result of such arbitration and negotiation efforts often includes compromises on technology use while preserving worker's wages, health, and pension benefits.