Final answer:
Anti-globalization advocates argue that globalization fosters economic inequality, negatively impacts the environment and local economies, and can lead to weaker labor movements and dominance of large corporations over government policies.
Step-by-step explanation:
Advocates and anti-globalization protesters often argue that globalization fosters economic inequality. They are concerned with the negative impacts on the environment and local economies, where rapid industrialization can lead to damage due to lack of regulatory environments. Additionally, globalization tends to lead to weak labor movements in countries where jobs are scarce and can force economically weaker nations to open their markets while protecting their own products from competition. This can be detrimental to agricultural products from poor countries that are already vulnerable to external factors like weather and international price volatility.
Economic inequality may be exacerbated due to the dominance of large corporations that benefit from free trade, potentially influencing governments to prioritize corporate interests. The relocation of manufacturing to countries with cheaper labor and weaker environmental laws also contributes to job losses and rising inequality in developed countries. Ultimately, while some argue that globalization improves the average standard of living through free trade and comparative advantage, many others are critical of the unequal power dynamics and exploitation present in global corporate capitalism.