Final answer:
According to the ACM Code of Ethics, whistleblowing should be done internally and responsibly. The code stresses the importance of addressing issues within the organization professionally, while also acknowledging the personal risks involved. Anonymity can protect whistleblowers, as seen in crucial journalistic instances.
Step-by-step explanation:
The ACM Code of Ethics provides guidance on professionalism and ethical conduct for individuals in the field of computing. When it comes to whistleblowing, the ACM Code of Ethics indicates that it should be done internally and responsibly. This reflects the understanding within the field that individuals who are part of a bureaucratic system are often best positioned to notice and address misconduct within that system. Anonymity, however, plays a critical role in the protection of whistleblowers, as seen in journalistic practices and high-profile cases like Edward Snowden's, which underscore the significance of source protection in bringing questionable practices to light without exposing the whistleblower to retaliation or legal repercussions.
Whistleblowers face difficult choices due to potential personal costs, including job termination, when reporting corruption or unethical behavior. Notwithstanding these challenges, the professional expectation is clear: reporting should be done responsibly, and, while not necessarily anonymous within the organization, it needs to be performed in a manner that addresses the issue without breaching professional responsibilities or personal safety. The ACM Code advocates for responsible conduct, suggesting that personal gain should never be a motive in these actions.