Question

Some maintain that rules about right and wrong are not just opinion, but are objective things that exist in the real world, and can be discovered just as the law of gravity or principles of probability were. This position is known as:

a) Ethical relativism
b) Moral subjectivism
c) Moral absolutism
d) Cultural relativism

Answer 1

The belief that moral principles exist objectively and can be discovered like scientific principles corresponds to moral absolutism.

Step-by-step explanation:

The position that rules about right and wrong are not just opinions, but objective realities in the world, is known as moral realism, which aligns with the concept of moral absolutism. Under moral absolutism, it is believed that there are universal moral truths that apply to all individuals at all times, similar to how the law of gravity applies universally. By contrast, moral relativism, including its version known as cultural relativism, suggests that moral principles and values are relative to cultural context and therefore can vary from one society to another. Normative Ethical Relativism also falls under this category, asserting that no universal moral standards bind all individuals. Instead, it postulates that morality is culturally based and society-specific. Moral skepticism, on the other hand, questions the objective nature of moral claims entirely.

Given the description, the correct answer to the question is (c) Moral absolutism, as this philosophical position maintains that moral laws are objective and can be discovered in a way akin to scientific laws, like gravity or probability.