Final answer:
One objection to subjective relativism is moral objectivism. Moral objectivists argue that there are universal moral principles that apply to all people, regardless of their personal opinions or cultural backgrounds. Another objection is that imposing views promotes ethical consistency.
Step-by-step explanation:
One objection to the subjective relativist argument that everyone ultimately decides on their own morality is moral objectivism. Moral objectivism is the idea that there are objective moral truths that exist independent of individual beliefs or cultural norms. It argues that there are universal moral principles that apply to all people, regardless of their personal opinions or cultural backgrounds. Moral objectivists believe that there are objective moral values and duties that are binding on everyone. They argue that moral relativism, which is the idea that moral values are subjective and vary from person to person or culture to culture, undermines the possibility of moral progress and promotes ethical inconsistency. Imposing views promotes ethical consistency is another objection to subjective relativism. It argues that without some level of imposition of moral views, there would be no consistency in ethics, as individuals could simply adopt whatever moral code they please without any regard for the well-being of others or the common good.