Final answer:
Correct Answer is B) .Chapter leaders in fraternities or sororities may only be held personally responsible for hazing violations if proven negligent, meaning responsibility is not automatic but depends on evidence of negligence.
Step-by-step explanation:
When hazing violations occur, it's not always clear-cut whether the chapter leadership such as the Chapter President, Vice President of Membership, or Pledge Educator can be held personally responsible. The most correct answer, without having specific context or guidelines from a particular institution or national fraternity, would generally be b) True, only if proven negligent. This would imply that they can only be held responsible if there is evidence that they did not exercise the reasonable care that is expected from someone in their position. Usually, negligence is a key factor in determining personal liability, but it does not confer automatic responsibility just by virtue of holding a position.