Final answer:
The significance of a coat of arms is not limited to ritual alone, hence it would be false to state that its special significance is only exemplified in rituals. Instead, coats of arms also have legal and heraldic importance. Additionally, historical context is necessary to answer exercises regarding the Glorious Revolution, Loyalists, the Spanish reconquest of the Iberian Peninsula, the Iroquois Confederacy, and the Proclamation of 1763.
Step-by-step explanation:
The question regarding the special significance of the coat of arms being exemplified only in ritual could be considered false, as coats of arms carry significance beyond ritual, including legal, social, and heraldic implications. As for the exercises provided, they reference historical events and evaluations which require context to correctly answer. For instance:
- According to John Locke, the Glorious Revolution was a legitimate one.
- The Loyalists were protected by the treaty and well treated after it was signed.
- For the Spanish, reconquering the Iberian Peninsula was both a military and religious action.
- All of the tribes in the Iroquois Confederacy maintained neutrality during the Revolutionary War.
- The Proclamation of 1763 was enacted in part as a response to Pontiac's War.
To correctly answer each, one would need a firm understanding of the historic context and viewpoints of the figures involved.