Final answer:
All of the listed aspects, including whether corporations can exercise religion, whether the government has a compelling interest in requiring contraceptive coverage, and whether religious freedom extends to for-profit corporations, were addressed by the U.S. Supreme Court in the Hobby Lobby opinion of the case Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc.
Step-by-step explanation:
The question refers to which aspects were left unanswered by the U.S. Supreme Court in the Hobby Lobby opinion regarding Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. According to the ruling, the Court addressed the following points:
- Corporations can exercise religion.
- The government has a compelling interest in requiring contraceptive coverage.
- Religious freedom extends to for-profit corporations like Hobby Lobby.
Therefore, the correct answer is that all of the above were addressed in the opinion. The Supreme Court held that the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA) applied to for-profit corporations and that these entities could be exempt from the contraceptive mandate of the Affordable Care Act (Obamacare) if it violated their religious beliefs. The Court found a less restrictive method of providing such coverage without infringing upon the rights of the company's owners.