Question

To argue fraud-related consequential damages in court, lawyers often find that which of the following is true?

a. The fraud report alone usually suffices.
b. The fraud report plus the investigator's testimony usually suffices.
c. Completely separate reports may be required.
d. The fraud investigator will generally need a signed confession in most states.

Answer 1

Lawyers arguing fraud-related consequential damages in court usually need both the fraud report and the investigator's testimony to establish their case.

Step-by-step explanation:

In court, lawyers arguing fraud-related consequential damages often find that the fraud report alone does not suffice. To establish their case, they usually rely on both the fraud report and the investigator's testimony. This combination provides stronger evidence and helps convince the court that the damages were a direct result of the fraud.