Question

Which strategy is an opposing attorney likely to apply in deposing a weak expert witness?

a. Attack the witness vigorously to destroy his or her credibility.
b. Destroying the credibility of a weak witness would likely result in the witness being replaced by a stronger expert.
c. Ask questions that show the expert witness the strength of the opposing attorney's case.
d. Ask many questions but go easy on the expert witness.
e. None of these.

Answer 1

In deposing a weak expert witness, an opposing attorney will likely question their motivation and biases, refute their counterclaims, and showcase the strength of their case, while maintaining fair.

Step-by-step explanation:

In deposing a weak expert witness, an opposing attorney is likely to employ a strategy that showcases the weaknesses in the witness's testimony without completely discrediting them, to avoid the witness

Questioning the motivation and potential bias of the expert can subtly undermine their credibility. Additionally, asking questions that reveal the strength of the opposing attorney's case can also refute.

However, it is important to do so in a way that presents each argument fairly and objectively, challenging the expert's knowledge and consistency, rather than engaging in aggressive attacks that may not be viewed favorably by the jury.