183k views
3 votes
The Supreme Court in the Kumho Tire Co. v. Carmichael case ruled that the Daubert conditions were merely illustrative and applied to which of these?

a. All scientific testimony.
b. Nonscientific testimony.
c. Applicable nonscientific testimony in some state courts.
d. Applicable nonscientific testimony in federal courts.

1 Answer

0 votes

Final answer:

The Daubert conditions were ruled to apply to applicable nonscientific testimony in federal courts.

Step-by-step explanation:

The Supreme Court in the Kumho Tire Co. v. Carmichael case ruled that the Daubert conditions were merely illustrative and applied to applicable nonscientific testimony in federal courts.

User Gobra
by
8.0k points