Final answer:
Conflict detection for change requests can indeed be set up to occur through a scheduled job or initiated manually. It may not always be executed with every update to a request, as this depends on organizational processes and system configurations. A combination of scheduled and manual conflict detection is often true and considered best practice.
Step-by-step explanation:
In addressing the question about which statement is true regarding conflict detection for change requests, it's important to understand the context, which is typically in a project management or IT service management environment. Here are the considerations to explain the true statement among the options provided:
- Conflict detection is an integral part of managing change requests to anticipate and address potential issues that can arise when changes are made to IT systems or projects.
- Conflict detection is not necessarily executed every time an active change request is updated, as this would depend on the system configuration and the process established within the organization.
- Many systems that manage change requests include a scheduled job functionality that regularly checks for conflicts, allowing for proactive management of changes.
- Lastly, conflict detection can often be initiated manually, offering more control to the personnel managing the change requests to detect conflicts at any given time.
Therefore, options C and D are generally true. Option A might be true in some systems where real-time conflict checking is enabled, but this is not always the case. Option B seems to suggest all mentioned statements are true; however, without knowing the specific context or system, this cannot be taken as universally correct. As such, a combination of option C, D, or both option C and D, depending on the system, is the correct answer.