Final answer:
The notice at the hockey arena stating the arena's non-liability for flying pucks is a disclaimer of liability, not a contract of adhesion. It serves as a warning rather than a contract demanding adherence to terms without negotiation, rooted in the principle of 'assumption of risk'. Therefore, it is false to label the notice as a contract of adhesion.
Step-by-step explanation:
The sign at the entrance of a hockey arena stating, "This arena is not responsible for pucks that might fly into the crowd," is not necessarily a contract of adhesion. A contract of adhesion is a standardized contract prepared by one party, usually a company with stronger bargaining power, for a weaker party to sign, often without the opportunity for negotiation. It is referred to as 'adhesion' because the weaker party can only 'adhere' to the terms without changing them.
However, the notice at a hockey arena is more of a disclaimer or a warning to spectators of the inherent risks associated with attending a hockey game. Such notices are intended to limit the liability of the arena for any injuries caused by events that are a natural part of a hockey game, such as pucks flying into the stands. This is rooted in the legal principle of 'assumption of risk,' where spectators are understood to assume certain risks when they choose to attend the game.
In conclusion, while a contract of adhesion forces one party to accept terms without negotiation, a disclaimer at a sports event is a notification of risk that does not necessarily form a contractual relationship between the arena and the spectators, and thus it is false to consider such a warning as a contract of adhesion.