Final answer:
To release a reporter's name, consent from the reporter or a court order is required under the auspices of reporter's privilege and according to the Supreme Court's ruling in Branzburg v. Hayes.
Step-by-step explanation:
Before releasing a reporter's name, it is essential to consider the legal framework surrounding the protection of sources and the right to free press. The practice referred to as reporter's privilege has its roots in the First Amendment's protection of the press, allowing journalists to offer confidentiality to their sources to shield them from government prosecution. However, this is not an absolute protection. The Supreme Court's ruling in Branzburg v. Hayes (1972) clarified that journalists could be compelled to name confidential sources if required for a criminal trial. Given these legal precedents, the correct action before releasing a reporter's name would likely involve either consent from the reporter or a court order, depending on the specific circumstances and legal requirements at the time.