Final answer:
The Gibbons vs. Ogden ruling reinforced federal power, giving Congress the authority to regulate interstate commerce and setting the precedence that federal laws trump state laws in such matters, thus advancing federalism.
Step-by-step explanation:
Effects of the Gibbons vs. Ogden Ruling
The Gibbons vs. Ogden decision of 1824 had far-reaching implications for the federal government's role in regulating interstate commerce. Based on a conflict over steamboat operating licenses between New York and New Jersey, the Supreme Court, led by Chief Justice John Marshall, determined that regulating interstate commerce fell under the federal government's domain. This landmark ruling effectively struck down a New York state law that granted an exclusive steamboat operating license, which was seen as 'repugnant' to the Constitution.
This decision reinforced the power of the national government and highlighted the supremacy of federal law over state law when it comes to interstate trade. By broadly interpreting 'interstate commerce' as 'commercial intercourse' among states, Congress was given the authority to regulate navigation. The ruling further established the principle that when federal and state laws conflict, federal laws hold precedence. The impact of this case fostered the expansion of federal power and encouraged economic development by upholding the doctrine of implied powers and confirming the Constitution's Supremacy Clause.
The Gibbons vs. Ogden ruling was a cornerstone in the advancement of federalism and helped to delineate the boundaries between state and national jurisdictions in economic matters of commerce and navigation.