Final answer:
Credible evidence is determined by verifying the source's reliability, checking for bias, and ensuring testimony comes from experts in the relevant field. The quantity and quality of evidence to support a knowledge claim vary by subject, while expert consensus and resistance to bias are critical when considering which evidence to trust. Historical inquiries also necessitate the development of questions that effectively guide the investigation.
Step-by-step explanation:
To ensure a question is passed and evidence is creditable, several factors must be considered. First, the source of the information should be evaluated to determine if it is reliable, which includes looking at whether the evidence can be verified and whether there is any bias. Evidence used must be supported by credible sources and must be sufficient to justify the claims made.
Secondly, it is essential to assess if the person providing the testimony is an expert in the relevant field. This includes understanding whether there is a consensus among experts on the subject matter and if the testimony aligns with this consensus. An expert's education, experience, and knowledge enhance the credibility of their testimony.
Finally, the amount and type of evidence needed to support a knowledge claim depends on the question at hand. For instance, in historical contexts, evidence of a lineage, such as confirming that election officials are democratically elected, is crucial. When evaluating testimony, one must consider justification, reliability, and potential conflicts with currently held beliefs.
To critically examine evidence, such as that presented by someone named Trevor, one should review the logic, credibility, and logic of the position. Also critical is to consider if any relevant points have been omitted, which can influence the acceptance or rejection of the author's conclusions. In historical inquiry, developing compelling and supporting questions is key to guide the inquiry process effectively.