Final answer:
Documentation of pain management should be precise and include both subjective and objective measures of pain. The best documentation example provided is 'Administered pain medication at 2:00 PM'. Pain measurement scales or objective data such as skin conductance fluctuations enhance the assessment of treatment effectiveness.
Step-by-step explanation:
The documentation of a patient's pain management effectiveness should be objective and should include specific information that can be measured and verified. In the context of the given options, the most appropriately written documentation is "Administered pain medication at 2:00 PM." This statement provides a clear and precise action that was taken, along with the time it occurred, which is useful for evaluating the effectiveness of the pain management strategy. To further assess pain management, documentation should also include the patient's report of pain on a validated scale, like the Wong-Baker Faces pain-rating scale, or objective measures of pain such as skin conductance fluctuations. It's often useful to have both subjective patient reports and objective data when evaluating pain management.
When considering the effectiveness of the pain management treatment, as related to the alternative hypothesis described earlier, documentation should also reflect whether the patient's reported pain scores or objective measures have decreased, indicating effective pain control. For instance, comments such as "Patient rated pain as 3/10 after medication, compared to 7/10 before administration" would be more useful than vague terms like 'seems better' or 'not improving'.