Final answer:
Lisa's concerns about her representative's use of fear appeals and personal attacks reflect the principle of parrhesia in ethical public speaking, focused on truth and constructive, respectful dialogue.
Step-by-step explanation:
Lisa's concerns best reflect the basic principle of ethical public speaking known as parrhesia, which involves courageous public speech inspired by a moral desire to reveal the truth and demand social change. Ethical public speaking upholds the integrity of dialogue by avoiding fear appeals and personal attacks, focusing instead on constructive conversations that incorporate logos (logical appeal), ethics, and timeliness.
It is crucial for public speakers, especially politicians, to communicate effectively by representing all sides fairly, stating positions clearly, and supporting them with credible evidence. Using non-inflammatory language and showing empathy can help convince others to support one's position without undermining the integrity of the dialogue.
Therefore, Lisa is advocating for a style of communication that prioritizes rational arguments and respectful deliberation over personal attacks and fear-mongering, reflecting the core values of ethical public speaking.