Final answer:
The specific purpose statement lacks focus and tries to cover too much ground, which can lead to disinterest from the audience and a perception of it not being trustworthy. It should be narrowed down to address one specific issue at a time, such as solely promoting a new recycling program, to make it more manageable and impactful.
Step-by-step explanation:
The specific purpose statement, "I want my audience to support federal action to combat greenhouse pollution, and a new program to promote recycling in our area," might fall into the trap of being too broad and lacking a focused objective. When drafting a proposal on a complex issue such as climate change, it is crucial to narrow down the topic to something manageable and specific. The problem with this statement is that it tries to tackle multiple substantial issues at once, which can lead to a lack of focus and may not adequately address the community context or expectations. This lack of specificity can result in the audience losing interest or the message not being seen as objective or trustworthy.
To improve the statement, one should define a clear, single goal to maintain focus. For example, Shawn Krukowski could refine his thesis by focusing solely on promoting the new recycling program first and detailing specific actions the federal government can take, thus avoiding a sprawling and ineffective message. Honing the subject, angle, tone, and content to closely align with community needs and expectations will generate a more engaging and trustworthy proposal.