Final answer:
The true statement is A) A large sample of highly competent evidence is persuasive if it is relevant to the objective being tested. To evaluate the persuasiveness of evidence, one should consider its size, competence, relevance, and the expert consensus on the subject matter.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement that is true is: A) A large sample of highly competent evidence is persuasive if it is relevant to the objective being tested. When determining the persuasiveness of evidence in any field, it is critical to consider several factors. These factors include the size of the sample, the competence of the evidence, its relevance, and timeliness. A larger sample size with high-quality, relevant evidence typically provides a stronger basis for conclusions.
Bias and expert consensus also play crucial roles. Testimony from an unbiased expert that aligns with the consensus among peers in the relevant field can be highly persuasive. Additionally, whether evidence is persuasive can also depend on how well it aligns with the logical development of points and agrees with established facts within the discipline.
Finally, the sufficiency of the evidence is an important consideration. Even though larger samples are generally better, in some cases, small samples cannot be avoided and may still provide valuable insights. Understanding the principles of selecting and evaluating evidence enhances the ability to effectively support or challenge hypotheses and conclusions.