Final answer:
Without access to the video content, it is not possible to accurately provide the conclusion of the argument. The question suggests a discussion on the legality of certain actions and legal complexities such as racial profiling and enforcement of legal norms.
Step-by-step explanation:
The conclusion of the argument presented in the video, which seems to discuss the legality of an action, could be any of the options provided. However, without access to the video content, we cannot determine the correct answer. The provided statements 'It's prohibited by law,' 'Driving without a license is illegal,' and 'Driving without a license is unlawful' all convey the same general concept that an action is not allowed by law. Yet, without specific details from the video, we cannot reliably choose between options A, B, C, or D. It's crucial to remember that terms like 'prohibited,' 'illegal,' and 'unlawful' are often used interchangeably when referring to something that is against the law.
The question touches upon the legal dilemma where critics argue against Senate Bill 1070 (2010), mentioning that it could lead to racial profiling and invoking the term 'Driving While Brown.' Additionally, the provided information engages in a discussion about the nature of legal norms with regards to crimes such as bank robbery and driving while intoxicated (DWI), indicating the societal and legal complexities involved in law enforcement and legal interpretations.