Final answer:
Wildlife biologists are least likely to recruit citizen scientists for tasks like DNA analysis due to the specialized training and equipment required, whereas more accessible tasks are more suitable for citizen science.
Step-by-step explanation:
Wildlife biologists least likely recruit citizen scientists to engage in data collection activities that require specialized training, expertise, and often expensive equipment. These tasks would include options such as E. Collect and analyze DNA from hair samples collected at 2 locations. Scientific analysis of DNA samples requires a level of precision and understanding of molecular techniques that is generally beyond the scope of citizen science projects, which tend to focus on more accessible, cost-effective, and less technically demanding tasks. In contrast, tasks such as observing wildlife at a watering hole or using camera traps are more suitable to citizen science efforts due to their simpler data collection processes.