132k views
1 vote
Why did nitti reluctantly accept the lack of territorial gains?

User Jgraft
by
7.8k points

1 Answer

0 votes

Final answer:

Italy and other countries reluctantly accepted the lack of territorial gains post-World War I due to President Wilson's opposition, limited territorial redistribution at the peace conferences, and fears of socialism's rise. National disappointment, internal socio-economic issues in Italy, and the societal impacts of war influenced their decisions.

Step-by-step explanation:

The reluctance to accept the lack of territorial gains post-World War I was a result of various factors impacting different countries. For Italy, which had been promised land in Dalmatia through the 1915 Treaty of London but had to relinquish it, the decision was met with national disappointment and anti-American sentiment because of President Wilson's opposition. Similarly, other nations like France and Japan were also left discontented with the outcomes of territorial redistribution. France received only part of Germany's African colonies, and Japan was limited to some German colonies in Asia and the Pacific. Meanwhile, the situation worsened internally in Italy after unification; the extension of Piedmontese low tariffs harmed southern industries, tax hikes were necessary to pay off war debts, and the state had insufficient funds to address the south's socio-economic issues.

Furthermore, fears over the rise of socialism made European leaders hesitant to end the war without clear victories. They believed that conceding to the status quo might be interpreted as an admission of a colossal mistake given the massive wartime sacrifices. As the burden of continuous conflict became apparent, governments and leaders had to contend with societal pressures and the practicalities of their nations' states, which influenced their decisions in treaty negotiations and acceptance of territorial outcomes.

User Adam Plumb
by
7.4k points