Final answer:
The question about what Rutter compared the Romain orphans' results to seems to refer to the work of Michael Rutter, who compared the development of Romanian orphans adopted into UK families to UK-raised children. The provided reference material does not relate directly to Rutter's work. His study highlighted the lasting developmental challenges faced by the orphans, despite changes in their environment.
Step-by-step explanation:
In answering what Rutter compared the Romain orphans' results to, it appears there may be some confusion with the content provided as the reference material does not directly pertain to the specific scholarship of Michael Rutter and his work with Romanian orphans. Rutter, a developmental psychologist, compared the outcomes of Romanian orphans adopted into UK families to the outcomes of children raised in the UK to understand the effects of institutionalization on child development. His landmark study assessed the orphans' cognitive, emotional, and social development, contrasted with that of children who had not experienced such severe early deprivation.
The information presented in the references, which mentions Ancient Rome, the Red Cross Hospital in Rouen, and Christian critiques of Roman cultural institutions, does not relate to Michael Rutter's research on Romanian orphans. However, to stay on topic, Rutter's research showed that even after being placed in enriching environments, the orphans experienced lingering developmental challenges, indicating the importance of early child-environment interactions.