Final answer:
Mary Beth Rose's argument explores the symbolism and thematic elements within a play, examining how characters use personas and performances to reflect complex themes. It likely also discusses symbolic representations of divinity and socio-religious themes, situated within a broader discussion of narrative forms and gender roles.
Step-by-step explanation:
The discussion of Mary Beth Rose's argument seems to imply an analysis of symbolism and thematic elements in a play, possibly relating to divine representations and the intersection of gender roles within religious or dramatic contexts.
In plays, symbolism is often used for deeper narrative meaning, such as the use of the poker game, streetcars, and names in Tennessee Williams's A Streetcar Named Desire. Rose's argument might focus on how characters, like Blanche, use performance and personas to navigate their realities and the symbolism this entails in relation to themes such as sex and death.
The mention of the Throne of Wisdom and Mary as the church itself suggests an examination of iconography and its symbolic relevance within a narrative structure. Given the context provided, Rose's argument could deal with how characters in heightened moments of a play often reflect complex socio-religious themes through their interactions and symbolic representations.
Analyzing Mary Beth Rose's argument requires a deep dive into the intricacies of the play's themes, such as an analysis of imagery related to the divine, personal performances of self versus the authentic self, and the existential ties between life's fundamental forces.
In referring to other works and comparing symbolism, like Trumbore's theme definitions and representations of gender inequality among composers, it's clear that Rose's argument is situated within a broader discursive space that explores symbolic significance in narrative forms.