Final answer:
The term 'persons' in a legal context includes both male and female members, as concluded by Their Lordships in the case of Marquess of Abergavenny v Ram.
Step-by-step explanation:
The question pertains to the interpretation of the term 'persons' within a legal context. Their Lordships, referring to members of a judicial committee or bench, reached the conclusion that the word 'persons' is inclusive of both the male and female sex.
This interpretation is significant in legal proceedings as it ensures that statutory language encompasses both genders equally, thus having a direct impact on the application of laws. The context in which this statement was made, such as the judicial case 'Marquess of Abergavenny v Ram,' and specifically the citation 's32(1)(a),' suggests that the ruling was part of a statutory interpretation to resolve a legal question put forth by the Governor.
The subject of this question is Law. The case Marquess of Abergavenny v Ram is a legal case that involves the interpretation of the word "persons" and its inclusion of both male and female sex. The conclusion reached by the court was that the word "persons" indeed includes members of both sexes.