Question

The supreme court is the only area of government in which the traditions of dress, handshake, and formal announcement are still part of the proceedings. do you think it is important for the supreme court to hold on to tradition in this way?

Answer 1

The Supreme Court's traditions reflect its serious role and help maintain public perception and credibility, balancing historical practices with public expectations.

Step-by-step explanation:

The traditions of the Supreme Court, such as the robed justices, formal announcements, and the prohibition of cameras in the courtroom, serve to maintain the dignity and formality that underscore the gravity of the Court's role in interpreting the Constitution and the laws.

These traditions, some of which date back over two centuries, reinforce the Court's identity and the continuity of the judicial process. While some argue for modernization, such as allowing cameras for greater transparency, others defend these practices as essential to the institution's credibility and public perception as a serious, nonpartisan arbiter of the law.

Furthermore, the Supreme Court's formal customs also reflect its unique status as a co-equal branch of government that must operate in harmony with the Executive and Legislative branches, maintaining its position without direct confrontation. Thus, tradition in the Supreme Court is not simply about maintaining old customs but about preserving an image and process that foster respect and uphold the integrity of the judicial system.

Therefore, evaluating whether to retain or change these traditions involves carefully balancing respect for historical practices with the evolving expectations of the public for accessibility and transparency.