Final answer:
Thatcher's government did not yield to the demands of Bobby Sands' hunger strike, seeing it as a terrorist act, which led to public outcry and increased support for Irish nationalist causes, paralleling earlier public reactions to the Suffragette movement.
Step-by-step explanation:
The question seems to conflate the hunger strike of Bobby Sands with the earlier Suffragette movement, but addressing the core subject, Margaret Thatcher's government was unwavering during Bobby Sands' hunger strike. As Sands was a member of the Irish Republican Army (IRA) convicted for firearms possession, the Thatcher administration saw the hunger strike as a terrorist ploy and did not concede to the demands for prisoner-of-war-like status for Sands and other IRA prisoners. This stance led to much public criticism and heightened tension. The public response was mixed, with significant support for the prisoners among Irish nationalists, protests, and worldwide attention, drawing comparisons to the earlier Suffragette movement where activists were force-fed during their hunger strikes, as shown by similar acts of protest and the intense public reactions.