3.8k views
4 votes
"In the train it was no longer a question of being aware of my body in the third person, but in a triple person. In the train I was given not one but two, three places. I had already stopped being amused. It was not that I was finding febrile coordinates in the world. I existed triply: I occupied space. I moved toward the other---and the evanescent other, hostile but not opaque, transparent, not there, disappeared"

User Mark Vital
by
8.0k points

1 Answer

2 votes

Final answer:

The passage is a collegiate-level English reflection on multiplicity of self and identity, experienced during a train journey and paralleled with societal disconnection.

Step-by-step explanation:

The passage presents a complex reflection on identity and existence, conveying a sense of being multiplied or fragmented. It suggests that being in the train causes the speaker to experience themselves in more than one way, as they occupy physical space while also being mindful of others and the translucent, ephemeral other.

This concept ties into wider themes of self-awareness and the confrontation with difference and otherness, as these excerpts reflect upon the experience of feeling disconnected or disintegrated from a larger societal framework, while still seeking a profounder, perhaps metaphysical, connection with the universe and the future.

User Kiradotee
by
7.6k points