52.5k views
2 votes
With messy organization (ארגון מבולגן), sloppy (passive) campaign discipline, a problematic personality (no ש) and disgraceful (מחפיר) treatment of women and minorities - he took the presidency almost without blinking

User Chriv
by
7.3k points

1 Answer

5 votes

Final answer:

The question relates to the presidency and may involve historical perspectives of US leaders. Examples include the scandal-ridden Harding administration, the inefficient period following Hayes' controversial rise,

Step-by-step explanation:

The reference to a presidency affected by various political and personal flaws brings to mind historical analyses of past US presidents. For instance, the Harding administration is known for being fraught with scandal, despite President Harding's personal honesty, because he was ill-advised by unscrupulous friends, leading to his great distress. Similarly, the controversial rise of President Hayes set the tone for an era marked by politically motivated agendas and inefficiency that lasted for 24 years, during which no president was reelected, pointing towards a lack of confidence in leadership.

Moreover, the mismanagement and corruption seen in Farouk's reliance on an informal cabinet, which negatively impacted Egypt's military during a crucial conflict, reflects how poor leadership can undermine a nation's well-being and precipitate significant changes. However, a transformative leadership approach can sometimes emerge, as illustrated by President George H. W. Bush's leadership during Operation Desert Storm, despite underlying perceived weaknesses due to his New England background and broken tax pledges.

User Rahman
by
8.5k points