91.8k views
1 vote
When the company demonstrated the Atlas to the public at the beginning of 2016, the company employee was seen hitting (pa'al) it with a stick and hindering (hiph'il) it. This is to demonstrate its control (2 5LW, 1st starts w/ י), resistance (עמידה) and stability. To the company's surprise, this annual demo video received (no ק or ש) harsh criticism for the violent behavior and cruelty perpetrated (pa'al has ג) by those working on the robot. When it faced the acts (4LW) of bullying of the researchers who hindered (hiph'il) it from picking up objects, pushed and knocked him down, many saw this as something that should not be done (מעשים שלא ייעשו (this is a phrase)) in the human-machine relationship.

(has מ)

User Suparna
by
8.4k points

1 Answer

4 votes

Final answer:

The Atlas robot demonstration aimed to show off the robot's stability but received criticism for appearing violent. Comparably, historical and artistic representations can evoke similar public reactions, especially when related to sensitive subjects such as control or violence. Such incidents emphasize the importance of considering how demonstrations are perceived.

Step-by-step explanation:

The incident you're referring to involves the demonstration of the Atlas robot, during which the robot was intentionally obstructed and pushed to showcase its stability and resilience. This has sparked a debate over the ethical treatment of machines and the human-machine relationship.

Although the Atlas robot is not sentient and the actions taken during the demo were intended to display its control mechanisms, resistance capabilities, and stability, the demonstration was perceived negatively by some. This reaction can be compared to historical instances where artistic expressions or technological advancements, such as the use of fierce dogs in apartheid as depicted in art, evoke strong emotional responses due to their implications or associations with past events. Interpretations of these expressions can lead to criticism, especially when they touch on sensitive topics such as control, violence, or cruelty.

This scenario highlights the importance of considering public perception and the impact of demonstrations that might have unintended interpretations, thereby affecting the reputation of the company and the technology presented.

User Kushan Randima
by
9.2k points