Final answer:
Dehumanization processes involve stripping human qualities and rights, which leads to inequality, violence, and ethical contradictions; thus, any arguments for dehumanization are fundamentally inadequate and unacceptable in a rational society.
Step-by-step explanation:
The arguments for dehumanization and the reasons why they are inadequate. Dehumanization is a process in which a group of people is stripped off of their human qualities and equated with lesser life forms such as animals or diseases, to suppress any morale against violent acts. It is primarily seen as a stepping stone towards violent and hate-filled acts including genocide.
Three points to consider regarding why arguments for dehumanization are inadequate include:
- Humans have diverse and rich existences, and no one has the right to diminish that diversity except for satisfying vital needs responsibly.
- Labeling entire human groups in less-than-human terms enables heinous crimes and atrocities by overcoming the natural human revulsion against such acts.
- It creates societal imbalances that lead to gross disparities in health, welfare, and safety among different socio-economic groups.
Focusing on these points, it's clear that dehumanization is fundamentally flawed because it reinforces contradictory and morally hurtful behavior that no rational or ethical society should accept or normalize.