Question

Is there such a thing as honorable preemptive murder or crime? Is it right to kill in order to prevent something that might happen (i.e. Caesar might have become an evil emperor)?

Answer 1

Preemptive murder or crime is not considered honorable or right in any ethical or legal system. The killing of someone to prevent a potential threat or harm is not justifiable, as it goes against the principles of due process and the presumption of innocence.

Step-by-step explanation:

In societies governed by the rule of law, individuals accused of wrongdoing should be given a fair trial and provided the opportunity to defend themselves.

One example of a legal framework that rejects preemptive killing is the principle of self-defense. In self-defense cases, the use of lethal force is generally only justified if there is an immediate threat to one's life or the life of others. The intent is to stop an ongoing attack, rather than to prevent a hypothetical future harm.

It is important to distinguish between preemptive self-defense and preemptive murder or crime. Self-defense is a defensive action taken to protect oneself or others from imminent harm, while preemptive murder or crime involves intentionally causing harm to prevent a potential threat.

Hence, preemptive murder or crime is not considered honorable or right in any ethical or legal system. The killing of someone to prevent a potential threat or harm is not justifiable, as it goes against the principles of due process and the presumption of innocence.