Final answer:
The reported 85% is likely greater than the actual percentage of all adults in favor of a cell phone ban while driving due to a biased sample of respondents with strong opinions and selection bias. Accurate estimations require a representative sample and proper polling methods.
Step-by-step explanation:
The reported value of 85% is probably greater than the true percent of all adults who believe that all cell phone use while driving should be banned. The main reason for this is that the sample is taken from a group of readers who chose to respond to an online poll on parade.com. Such voluntary response samples tend to include individuals with more strong opinions on the issue, who may not be representative of the general population. Additionally, the method of collecting responses, such as an online poll, might not reach all segments of the population, which can lead to a selection bias.
Using confidence intervals from hypothetical studies and trends reported by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) regarding cell phone use, we can infer that accurate estimations should account for demographic variations and sampling methods. Furthermore, the capacity to draw valid inferences from a poll is dependent on using a randomly selected sample that is representative of the entire population, which is not the case with voluntary response polls like the one conducted by Parade magazine.