Question

Project: International Courts and Adjudication First, select a decision from the World Trade Organization's (WTO) Dispute Settlement Body (DSB). Second, select a decision from one of the courts mentioned below: the International Court of Justice (ICJ) the Court of Justice of the European Union (EU) the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) the International Criminal Court (ICC) Instructions: Summarize both decisions in a report of 750 words. Make sure you do the following: List the parties to the dispute. Discuss the matter being disputed. Refer to particular agreements, articles, directives, or sections of legislation referred to in the dispute. Cite the source of your information! Assignment Guidelines: Your response must: Follow the instructions provided. Show that you can conduct basic Internet research on an international court and DSB. Reveal some understanding of the adjudicative process. Show that you understand the key matter(s) in dispute. Incorporate some of the terms we have discussed in the last chapter on international law and source of international law. General Submission Requirements: Proofread for spelling, grammar, and punctuation. Use complete sentence structure and standard written English. Do not use texting abbreviations or other shortcuts. Make sure all that paragraphs have a minimum of six sentences.Project: International Courts and Adjudication First, select a decision from the World Trade Organization's (WTO) Dispute Settlement Body (DSB). Second, select a decision from one of the courts mentioned below: the International Court of Justice (ICJ) the Court of Justice of the European Union (EU) the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) the International Criminal Court (ICC) Instructions: Summarize both decisions in a report of 750 words. Make sure you do the following: List the parties to the dispute. Discuss the matter being disputed. Refer to part

Answer 1

The ICJ deals with inter-state disputes, the ICC prosecutes individuals for grave crimes, the WTO resolves trade disputes, and the EU Court enforces EU laws among member states.

Step-by-step explanation:

Understanding Decisions of International Courts

The International Court of Justice (ICJ) primarily handles disputes between nations. If any UN member state can bring forward a case to the ICJ, it lies within the court's jurisdiction, limited to interstate conflicts and also provides advisory opinions for UN organs. Cases often pertain to disagreements over boundaries and natural resources. When examining these disputes, the ICJ looks at international agreements and the UN Charter's relevant provisions to render a decision.

The International Criminal Court (ICC), unlike the ICJ, prosecutes individuals for international crimes such as genocide and war crimes. The ICC's legal foundation includes the Rome Statute, which outlines the court's functioning and the crimes under its jurisdiction. An ICC decision can result in individual criminal accountability.

Additionally, bodies like the World Trade Organization's (WTO) Dispute Settlement Body play a crucial role in managing international trade disputes. A key element of WTO's architecture is its robust dispute resolution system, providing a rule-of-law foundation that underpins a secure and predictable global trade environment. Disputes often involve interpretation of WTO agreements and obligations among its members.

The Court of Justice of the European Union (EU) addresses issues arising under EU law, encompassing cases that may deal with directives, regulations, or state compliance with EU treaties. The court ensures member states adhere to EU legislation, maintaining cohesion within the union.

Together, these courts and adjudicative bodies contribute to international law's enforcement, reflecting the principles discussed in learning about law of the sea, Geneva Conventions, and human rights law.