The counterpoint essay emphasizes the significance of empathy, clear communication, and proper timing (kairos) in crisis leadership, using strategies like parallelism and a fact-based objective stance to build consensus and address fear.
The essential idea of the counterpoint essay with steady sync leadership during a crisis is to persuade readers to understand the importance of empathy, coordination, and timing in the context of an emergency. The essay suggests ways to address the feelings of fear, the necessity for strong social cohesion and communication, and the importance of presenting your position at the right time or kairos. This might involve quoting interviews for emotional impact, using descriptive language for vivid imagery, and employing nonaggressive language to reach consensus.
Using parallelism, such as in Kennedy's speeches, can organize support, and emphasize ideas. A factual, objective stance, with credible synthesis from multiple sources, builds ethos, or trustworthiness. Lastly, a strong leader can help unite a community during a crisis, leveraging the connection to an audience through shared beliefs and the appropriate, impactful time of message delivery.
The question probable may be:
Which of the following strategies is NOT emphasized in the counterpoint essay discussing steady sync leadership during a crisis?
A. Importance of empathy
B. Use of parallelism
C. Aggressive language for impact
D. Fact-based objective stance and credible synthesis