Final answer:
Compliance is suitable for simple requests but not ideal for tasks that require more commitment, where commitment would be the better option. Compliance involves going along with a request without fully agreeing, which can be sufficient for minor ask but not for long-term tasks that need genuine enthusiasm and effort. The correct answer is option a.
Step-by-step explanation:
When considering influence tactic outcomes, compliance is not ideal for tasks that require more commitment but is acceptable for simple requests. Compliance essentially means going along with a request or demand without necessarily agreeing with it. This can be effective in situations where immediate and unenthusiastic conformity is sufficient, such as when someone agrees to a minor request in hopes of avoiding conflict or simply to move on to another subject.
However, for tasks that require a deeper level of engagement or dedication, such as projects that need continuous and thoughtful input, commitment is far more desirable. Commitment involves internal agreement and enthusiasm for the request or task, leading to better outcomes and contributions. Compliance, on the other hand, may result in only surface-level adherence and can be problematic if long-term or sustained effort is needed.
The phenomenon of compliance can be observed in social dynamics and is notably referenced in Asch's study on conformity, where individuals would comply with the majority even if they did not agree privately. This illustrates the power of social influence and how it can affect decision-making and behavior.