Final answer:
Putting people on probation or into diversion programs for nonviolent crimes rather than putting them in jail is more cost-effective and has the potential for successful rehabilitation and crime prevention.
Step-by-step explanation:
The rationale for putting people on probation or into diversion programs for nonviolent crimes rather than putting them in jail is that it makes more sense for the taxpayers. This is because probation and diversion programs are often more cost-effective compared to incarceration. By providing individuals with resources such as therapy, counseling, and educational or vocational programs, probation and diversion programs aim to rehabilitate offenders and reduce the likelihood of recidivism.
For example, drug courts incorporate drug treatment and monitoring into the criminal justice process, and studies have shown that they reduce recidivism rates. Additionally, restorative justice programs, which bring together offenders, victims, and communities, have been found to be cost-effective and lead to higher victim satisfaction.
Overall, these alternative programs not only save taxpayer dollars but also have the potential to successfully rehabilitate individuals and prevent future crimes.