Final answer:
Source A suggests that suffragettes, including Emmeline Pankhurst, engaged in direct, sometimes radical actions that led to arrests, indicating their strong commitment to campaigning for women's suffrage.
Step-by-step explanation:
From Source A, which depicts Emmeline Pankhurst being arrested during a suffragette campaign for female suffrage in 1914, several inferences can be drawn about the actions of suffragettes. First, the suffragettes were willing to participate in direct action that could lead to their arrest, reflecting their commitment to their cause and indicating their strategy of using public protest to gain attention.
Additionally, the arrest of such a prominent leader as Pankhurst suggests that the suffragettes' actions were seen as significant threats to the social order of the time, thus highlighting the radical nature of their activism.
The actions of the suffragettes often involved civil disobedience, such as heckling, stone-throwing, and other disruptive protests. The intensity of their campaign reflects their motto "deeds, not words" as they moved from peaceful advocacy to more visible and sometimes violent actions.
Ultimately, the suffragettes aimed to highlight the injustice of women's lack of voting rights through any means necessary, including those that risked their freedom and well-being.