Final answer:
The so-called voluntary work on Sunday was not truly voluntary due to the false narrative of choice and systemic inequality that results from dishonest leadership, where some individuals are effectively more equal than others.
Step-by-step explanation:
Voluntary work, in its essence, should embody the principle of free will, but when it is prescribed or coerced under the pretext of being voluntary, it loses its true meaning. The question we must address is why voluntary work on Sunday was not voluntary. It revolves around the façade of choice where a deeper examination might reflect societal pressures, authoritative implications, or social expectations masking coercion as voluntarism.
In the context provided, voluntary work on Sunday seems to carry an undertone of dishonesty by the new leaders, signaling a manipulative tactic to control and subjugate the masses while still maintaining a veneer of equality and fairness. This paradoxical situation can be interpreted as an extension of historical class struggles. Traditionally, the commoners, serfs, and slaves endured long hours under arduous conditions, motivated by the necessity to survive and support the luxurious lives of their superiors from whom they were inherently disconnected, perpetuating a cycle where the promise of equality remains unattainable.
This power imbalance is indicative of a society where some individuals are proclaimed to be more equal than others, deliberately or subconsciously undermining the genuine concept of voluntarism. When citizens participate in 'voluntary' labor under the shadow of oppression or expectations, spurred by the fear of social or economic retribution, their work is anything but voluntary. The mere label of 'voluntary' becomes a rhetorical device employed by those in power to sidestep the moral ramifications of exploiting others.
In conclusion, the so-called voluntary work on Sunday was not genuinely voluntary because it was underpinned by a false narrative of choice, influenced by an underlying systemic inequality that benefits certain groups over others - a clear testimony to the inherent dishonesty and skewed sense of equality promoted by the new leaders.