Final answer:
Outsourcing could quickly allow WEGL to offer customized T2 golf clubs but poses risks to quality and brand integrity, while in-house adaptation to mass customization can be costly but may increase control and long-term brand loyalty.
Step-by-step explanation:
The idea to outsource the manufacturing of the T2 golf clubs might address the issue of production flexibility and product customization, but also carries risks such as reduced quality control, potential intellectual property concerns, and the loss of in-house expertise. Outsourcing manufacturing can lower production costs if the economies of scale are achieved and might be a quick solution to offering a wider range of products without a significant upfront investment in new production processes and training. However, transitioning from a mass production to a mass customization strategy internally could better allow WEGL to control quality, lead times, as well as strengthen its brand image amongst consumers by leveraging the 'made in USA' appeal.
Butch Pearl’s concerns about increased complexity in manufacturing and the nightmarish task of creating accurate forecasts for hundreds of different product configurations are valid. These challenges, which come with mass customization, indeed demand advanced planning systems, sophisticated inventory management, and possibly a shift to a build-to-order or an assemble-to-order production process to minimize inventory costs and respond swiftly to customer demands. Such a strategic shift might require significant investments in technology and staff training but could provide a competitive edge in the long run, enhancing customer satisfaction and brand loyalty.