Final answer:
The distinction between full-time service for the lord and secular work is a nuanced issue, with historical and theological perspectives indicating that all Christians can be seen as part of the spiritual estate, regardless of their work.
Step-by-step explanation:
The question is addressing whether there should be a distinction between full-time service for the lord and secular work. Historically and from a theological standpoint, this has been a contentious issue with varying viewpoints. For instance, Martin Luther proposed that all Christians are part of the spiritual estate, challenging the notion of a stark divide between clergy and laypeople. The Puritans also emphasized the sanctity of one's calling, suggesting that secular work was an extension of religious duty and should contribute to the public good. Furthermore, distinctions between secular clergy and regular clergy in the history of the church suggest that various roles and functions have been recognized within the religious community itself, although derived from the same spiritual calling.
Overall, these examples show a complex relationship between religious service and secular work, wherein the two are often intertwined and valued for their contributions to community and spiritual life. The answer to the question thus explores the nuances of this relationship, making it not a simple true or false scenario.