Final answer:
Pahalk has a duty of care to report potential risks to Sebastian's safety despite confidentiality obligations, prioritizing Sebastian's well-being and seeking additional support for Patrick.
Step-by-step explanation:
In the described scenario, Pahalk, as a family support worker, has both legal and ethical obligations concerning confidentiality and the disclosure of information. Legally, while there is an obligation to maintain Patrick's confidentiality, this is overridden when there is a risk of harm to Sebastian or others, known as 'duty of care'. Pahalk must report any concerns of potential abuse or neglect to the proper authorities to ensure that Sebastian is safe. Ethically, Pahalk is bound by a professional code that prioritizes the well-being of the client.
This means that the safety of Sebastian is the paramount concern. In recognizing signs of caregiver stress and potential for harm, Pahalk should address Patrick's need for support, consider respite care solutions, and guide him to appropriate counseling services. At the same time, Pahalk must act to protect Sebastian, even if it involves breaking confidentiality.