Final answer:
Meeropol's claim is that Clinton's welfare reform in 1996, embodied by the signing of the PRWORA, represented a surrender to Reaganomics, contrary to the initial belief that Clinton's presidency would differ substantially from the Reagan era.
Step-by-step explanation:
Michael Allen Meeropol makes a claim that Bill Clinton's signing of the welfare reform law in 1996, specifically the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act (PRWORA), represented a form of capitulation to the principles of Reaganomics. According to Meeropol, Clinton's action signaled the achievement of key goals of the conservative Reagan Revolution, thereby challenging the initial belief that Clinton's election marked a departure from the policies of the Reagan era.
Instead, the adoption of welfare reform and other policy initiatives indicated that Clinton aligned with significant aspects of the conservative agenda, which call for reducing government assistance programs and promoting self-reliance through measures like the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) program. This program incorporated stringent requirements for welfare recipients, such as work or job training obligations, reflecting a distinct shift in federal welfare policy.