198k views
2 votes
In the provided excerpt by Michael Allen Meeropol on Bill Clinton's administration, we can identify the following points:

(a) One Claim by Meeropol:
Meeropol contends that the signing of the welfare reform law by Bill Clinton in 1996 signaled a surrender to Reaganomics and indicated the achievement of major goals of the Reagan Revolution. This implies that despite initial perceptions of Clinton's election as a repudiation of Reaganomics, his actions demonstrated alignment with key aspects of the Reagan era.

(b) One Historical Development Illustrated:
The historical development illustrated in the excerpt is the shift in welfare policy during Bill Clinton's presidency. The new Congress in 1995, influenced by the Republican agenda, aimed not only to balance the budget but also to fulfill Clinton's campaign promise of "ending welfare as we know it." This resulted in the transformation of welfare programs, particularly the Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC), aligning with Ronald Reagan's earlier proposal of "New Federalism" in 1982. The shift from federal entitlement to state control reflects a significant change in welfare policy during this period.

(c) One Limitation of Meeropol's Argument:
A limitation of Meeropol's argument lies in the characterization of Clinton's signing of the welfare reform law as a "surrender" to Reaganomics. While Meeropol highlights the compromises made by Clinton, he may oversimplify the complex political and economic factors that influenced the decisions. Clinton's actions could be seen as a response to a Republican-controlled Congress and the prevailing political climate, rather than a wholesale endorsement of Reaganomics. Meeropol's argument might benefit from a more nuanced consideration of the political dynamics at play during this period.

Briefly describe ONE claim made by Meeropol in the excerpt.

User Marvb
by
7.9k points

1 Answer

3 votes

Final answer:

Meeropol's claim is that Clinton's welfare reform in 1996, embodied by the signing of the PRWORA, represented a surrender to Reaganomics, contrary to the initial belief that Clinton's presidency would differ substantially from the Reagan era.

Step-by-step explanation:

Michael Allen Meeropol makes a claim that Bill Clinton's signing of the welfare reform law in 1996, specifically the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act (PRWORA), represented a form of capitulation to the principles of Reaganomics. According to Meeropol, Clinton's action signaled the achievement of key goals of the conservative Reagan Revolution, thereby challenging the initial belief that Clinton's election marked a departure from the policies of the Reagan era.

Instead, the adoption of welfare reform and other policy initiatives indicated that Clinton aligned with significant aspects of the conservative agenda, which call for reducing government assistance programs and promoting self-reliance through measures like the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) program. This program incorporated stringent requirements for welfare recipients, such as work or job training obligations, reflecting a distinct shift in federal welfare policy.

User Kammy
by
7.2k points