Final answer:
The Three-Fifths Compromise is true in terms of addressing representation and taxation. In the U.S., representative democracy is where citizens elect representatives to decide and create laws for them, and representatives must balance national roles with local constituent needs.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement 'The Three-Fifths Compromise dealt with the issue of representation and taxation' is true. The compromise was a result of deliberations during the 1787 United States Constitutional Convention over how slaves would be counted when determining a state's total population for legislative representation and taxing purposes. This agreement ruled that three out of every five slaves would be counted as part of the population regarding the distribution of taxes and the apportionment of the members of the United States House of Representatives.
Regarding representative democracy in the United States, it is worth noting that citizens elect representatives who vote on their behalf to make policy. The Obamacare fight illustrated the tension that can exist between representatives responding to the national legislative agenda and their accountability to local constituents. Traditionally, this balance has been understood through the delegate and trustee models of representation. A delegate acts according to the wishes of the constituents, while a trustee uses their judgment to make decisions on behalf of the people.